refactoring expected results because I'm using aggregate_raster_value_uri which is slightly different than the other implementation

git-svn-id: svn://scm.naturalcapitalproject.org/svn/invest-test-data@53 a1e471e8-3ae1-4eeb-aa86-f41caf2650e8

updating predictor data to use dem90m and the expected scenario results with the slightly changed predictor values

git-svn-id: svn://scm.naturalcapitalproject.org/svn/invest-test-data@41 a1e471e8-3ae1-4eeb-aa86-f41caf2650e8

git-svn-id: svn://scm.naturalcapitalproject.org/svn/invest-test-data@35 a1e471e8-3ae1-4eeb-aa86-f41caf2650e8

git-svn-id: svn://scm.naturalcapitalproject.org/svn/invest-test-data@34 a1e471e8-3ae1-4eeb-aa86-f41caf2650e8

git-svn-id: svn://scm.naturalcapitalproject.org/svn/invest-test-data@24 a1e471e8-3ae1-4eeb-aa86-f41caf2650e8